Grappling with words and the written, this new alphabet was stumbled upon. (This had not been a new issue already.) And almost, branching out into its own new criteria of terminology.
Still, it is a very neat way, in integrating nuances with text. No one would have thought of it except in circumstances where people are devoid of expression; like, doesn't words suffice? Redundancy in suffixes like it is a new slang, vestigial structures behind the units like it is accepted sub-culture. Squinting one's eyes here and there, throwing off balance here and there, now that is the way of communication. On plaine text.
From :), to ☺, to 3-D, then animated. Upon initial exposure, one was really awkward about it, immense calculation before the dissemination of 1 ☺. Together with the distribution of their frequency, the condition sufficient/necessary; delete it, or leave it? It was very rare for one to elute 1 ☺, on ongoing conversations or online remarks, of a virtual dimension in that sense.
It was not about the abhorrence towards "shallow communication", or finding no value in the ☺, total rejection towards it. As opposed to (oh tips toes, gushes, and breaths skippedly, waiting for the next words in a string of line). It was just with an interlaying factor added to writing, one has one more facet to delve in, and over-preoccupation until it becomes justifiable, and not fluidly like what messages should be.
Having come over, things are dealt more permissively. Tear down one's barriers;☺, :], :), use it when one feels like it. It is ok to intersperse with ☺s. Do not need to try too hard to come up with one's methodology. Its like with losing more of oneself, one gains a whole new world.
For some reason of sorts,☺ and :) has been used with such unrestrainedness, it is like a total release of one's energy. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment